In today's She Reads Truth, we read about Exodus and how that is all part of God's plan and that Exodus points us to Christ and his redemption. I can believe all of that on a macro level, but when I think about the micro level, I get all kinds of sad and angry. I imagine what my faith would have been like as a slave in Egypt, praying for deliverance and then realizing I would die before deliverance came. Or if I was a mother in Egypt whose baby boy was murdered while Moses grew up- miraculously delivered from death by God. Why not my son? Why did God let my child die?
I recognize that these are all different ways of wrestling with the question "why/ how can God allow suffering?" I think it's good to wrestle with it from a lot of different angles. It creates empathy and openness to learn.
Part of our reading from yesterday's She Reads Truth was from Genesis 3:16-19:
To the woman he said,
“I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing;
iin pain you shall bring forth children.
but he shall krule over you.”
“Because you have listened to the voice of your wife
and have eaten of the tree
lof which I commanded you,
‘You shall not eat of it,’
mcursed is the ground because of you;
nin pain you shall eat of it all the days of your life;
and you shall eat the plants of the field.
you shall eat bread,
till you return to the ground,
for out of it you were taken;
ofor you are dust,
and pto dust you shall return.”
Reading this curse brings grief and sadness and longing, and yes, anger, into my heart.
Thinking about those poor murdered babies, and the ones later- when Christ comes and Herod kills the babies in Bethlehem, I am often reminded of Ivan Karamazov's conversation with Alyosha in The Brothers Karamazov. I highly recommend reading the whole chapter and the next- they are powerful. (or just read the whole thing). In this chapter, Ivan, an "atheist" recounts multiple anecdotes of people torturing or abusing children. He says:
"Can you understand why a little creature, who
can't even understand what's done to her, should beat her little
aching heart with her tiny fist in the dark and the cold, and weep
her meek unresentful tears to dear, kind God to protect her? Do
you understand that, friend and brother, you pious and humble
novice? Do you understand why this infamy must be and is
permitted? Without it, I am told, man could not have existed on
earth, for he could not have known good and evil. Why should he
know that diabolical good and evil when it costs so much? Why,
the whole world of knowledge is not worth that child's prayer to
‘dear, kind God’! I say nothing of the sufferings of grown-up
people, they have eaten the apple, damn them, and the devil take
them all! But these little ones! I am making you suffer, Alyosha,
you are not yourself. I'll leave off if you like.”
“Never mind. I want to suffer too,” muttered Alyosha." . . .
". . . too high a price is asked for harmony; it's
beyond our means to pay so much to enter on it. And so I hasten
to give back my entrance ticket, and if I am an honest man I am
bound to give it back as soon as possible. And that I am doing.
It's not God that I don't accept, Alyosha, only I most respectfully
return Him the ticket.”
“That's rebellion,” murmured Alyosha, looking down
“Rebellion? I am sorry you call it that,” said Ivan earnestly.
“One can hardly live in rebellion, and I want to live. Tell me
yourself, I challenge you—answer. Imagine that you are creating
a fabric of human destiny with the object of making men happy in
the end, giving them peace and rest at last, but that it was essential
and inevitable to torture to death only one tiny creature—that
baby beating its breast with its fist, for instance—and to found
that edifice on its unavenged tears, would you consent to be the
architect on those conditions? Tell me, and tell the truth.”
“No, I wouldn't consent,” said Alyosha softly.
“And can you admit the idea that men for whom you are building
it would agree to accept their happiness on the foundation of
the unexpiated blood of a little victim? And accepting it would
[270] remain happy for ever?”
“No, I can't admit it. Brother,” said Alyosha suddenly, with
flashing eyes, “you said just now, is there a being in the whole
world who would have the right to forgive and could forgive?
But there is a Being and He can forgive everything, all and for
all, because He gave His innocent blood for all and everything.
You have forgotten Him, and on Him is built the edifice, and it
is to Him they cry aloud, ‘Thou art just, O Lord, for Thy ways
are revealed!’ ”
“Ah! the One without sin and His blood! No, I have not
forgotten Him; on the contrary I've been wondering all the time
how it was you did not bring Him in before, for usually all
arguments on your side put Him in the foreground. Do you
know, Alyosha—don't laugh! I made a poem about a year ago.
If you can waste another ten minutes on me, I'll tell it to you.” (from Brother's Karamazov, "Rebellion" Book V. Chapter IV).
The story continues, but I find the same question in my heart as Ivan poses: how could I choose to let even one child suffer, as millions have, to save the whole world? How could God choose that? I think part of the answer is that Christ can choose that because He was willing to suffer and die, and in doing so, saved the whole world. It still does not make sense to me, and I do not understand why God has allowed it to be so, but I trust that there is a wisdom there that I do not understand. I also think that I have a lot to learn about how God redeems suffering. By my math, nothing can redeem some kinds of suffering, but I'm not very good at math. ;)
At the same time, I believe that I am right to be angry at the suffering of the innocent. I believe that God is angry about injustice and that He will avenge it.